I found two wonderful dogs, but I also found a bitter and nasty war of ideals and philosophy, rank with dogma, poor logic, and even worse breeding practices. As with most wars, both sides have blood on their hands and both reek of hypocrisy and the shit they’ve been slinging at the other side. Despite my fondness for vicious personal attacks and heated debate, I didn’t expect to find them while looking intently for a cute bundle of fur that would be my next faithful friend.
You’ll hear a lot about the two dogs I found in my search, Dublin and Celeste, for they are easily the best Border Collies I have ever had the pleasure of owning, as much for their own merits as for my growing sophistication as a Border Collie aficionado. But for my first post on this subject, I should focus on ground zero of the BC war: the AKC vs. the ABCA.
Every border collie came from a breeder, whether intentional or accidental, and it is that small group of people who are going to determine where the breed is going. If you’ve purchased a purebred registered BC in the last 10 years, you’ve probably come up against the war between the two largest BC registries, the American Border Collie Association (ABCA) and the American Kennel Club (AKC).
In a sweeping generalization, the ABCA is the “working dog” registry and the AKC is the “show dog” registry, or at least that’s how they derive their cachet. Actual working dogs and dogs shown in conformation make up only a fraction of each registry. Despite both organizations’ claims to be about the betterment of the breed and breed health, their raison d’etre is to be book keepers that maintain a database of dog pedigrees for money.
The ABCA registers about 20,000 border collies–and only border collies–per year. The hundred year old International Sheep Dog Society registry in the UK registers around 6,000 border collies per year, and the two registries recognize each other’s papers with good faith and both bill themselves as the working border collie registry.
In comparison, the AKC registers just over 2,100 border collies per year, although this figure doesn’t count the numerous unregistered Border Collies that compete in Obedience, Rally, Agility, Herding, Tracking, etc. that are given Indefinite Listing Privilege numbers that allow participation in AKC events without being fully registered with the AKC.
Even so, this is a far cry from the most popular breeds in the AKC like the Labrador Retrievers, Yorkshire Terriers, German Shepherd Dogs, Golden Retrievers, and Beagles. The Border Collie ranks 56th out of the AKCs 155 breeds and makes up only 0.25% (one in four-hundred) of the 870,000 dogs the AKC registers each year.
| Breed | 2006 Count |
| Retrievers (Labrador) | 123,760 |
| Yorkshire Terriers | 48,346 |
| German Shepherd Dogs | 43,575 |
| Retrievers (Golden) | 42,962 |
| Beagles | 39,484 |
| Dachshunds | 36,033 |
| Boxers | 35,388 |
| Poodles | 29,939 |
| Shih Tzu | 27,282 |
| Miniature Schnauzers | 22,920 |
| Chihuahuas | 22,562 |
| Bulldogs | 21,037 |
| Pugs | 20,008 |
| … | … |
| Border Collies | 2,181 |
The AKC and the English KC register about the same number of Border Collies per year even though the KC registers only 270,000 dogs annually. The Border Collie is in the UK’s top 30:
Labrador Retriever 45,700 Cocker Spaniel 20,459 English Springer Spanial 15,133 German Shepherd Dog (Alsatian) 12,857 Staffordshire Bull Terrier 12,729 Cavalier King Charles Spaniel 11,411 Golden Retriever 9,373 West Highland White Terrier 9,300 Boxer 9,066 Border Terrier 8,916 Rottweiler 6,575 Shih Tzu 4,436 Miniature Schnauzer 4,396 Lhasa Apso 4,154 Yorkshire Terrier 4,042 Bulldog 3,522 Dobermann 3,388 Bull Terrier 3,361 Weimaraner 2,744 Pug 2,681 Whippet 2,672 Dogue de Bordeaux (Imp) 2,361 Bichon Frise 2,329 Border Collie 2,219
After 10 years of AKC recognition, the Border Collie has evened out at 9:1 ratio of Working Registry dogs to Show Registry dogs, compared with the UK where the Border Collie has been shown for over a decade longer than in the US and has a ratio of 2.7 ISDS dogs to each KC dog. As best as I can tell, conformation showing started in the early 1980s in England, in 1995 in the United States, and in the late 1950s in Australia and New Zealand. The significant head start that the “Oz” dogs had in conformation showing has resulted in a handful of Australian kennels dominating the UK and US show lines.
The ABCA started in the early 1980s, although it wasn’t the predominant US registry until the collapse of the American International Border Collie registry and the North American Sheep Dog Society registry, leaving the lone ABCA to cater specifically to the breed. The ABCA website quotes 100,000 BCs registered by 1997, and roughly 20,000 dogs per year since then. Unlike the AIBC and the NASDS which were privately held businesses run by individuals which promptly fell apart following the founder’s deaths, the ABCA is a more democratic organization that will likely survive future transitions of power despite its current leadership comprising many members who have been with the organization from the start.
The rise of the ABCA and the details of their fight against AKC recognition is documented in a new book by author and Border Collie enthusiast, Donald McCaig. It’s called “The Dog Wars: How the Border Collie Battled the American Kennel Club” and my copy arrived this morning. The book was just published and I ordered it the moment I knew it existed. Given the title, you can expect a full review and analysis here. This post has been in the back of my mind since I signed up for this blog six months ago and it has been the topic of many conversations and bannings on both the ABCA and AKC enthusiast bulletin boards over the last two years. I wanted to set down my current view of the debate now before I read one page of the book, and since I’m eager to read it, this post had to be published.
Despite the advertising hype, dogma, and theoretical vitriol thrown at the AKC by the ABCA establishment, there are a list of things that neither registry does that is really troubling:
Neither registry requires any sort of health testing to register d
ogs from current stock. DNA, X-Ray, Eye Exams play no part in becoming a breeder or owner if you buy or breed dogs that already have registration numbers with the ABCA or AKC or a registry they accept transfers from. The ABCA requires PRA and CEA testing only for imported dogs and eye exams for the handful of dogs running in the National Finals. Despite CEA being a rather minor condition and the availability of DNA tests to determine carrier status, no puppies from a CEA or PRA dog can be registered even if they are clear or carriers.
The only required tests are for imported stock, ROM stock, dogs in the National Finals, and dogs that are registered more than two years after birth. This is a scant few dogs. CEA is a minor disease and PRA is very rare. There are more common and more lethal diseases that play no part in the current testing and registration scheme.
This scheme is essentially telling you to wipe your feet at the door, but pay no mind to the festering carpets inside.
Neither registry requires reporting or publication of any test results. Even if you do test, the registry and the world never has to know about good or bad results. You can bet that a false sense of security arises out of under-reporting of bad results and an over emphasis of good results.
Neither registry prevents in-breeding or line breeding to any degree. The ABCA website says the following:
Can in-bred pups be registered? Yes. No policy governs in-breeding or line-breeding.
Are there known health problems with in-breeding dogs? Yes. Ask your veterinarian’s advice, or read a comprehensive dog genetics book.
Read a comprehensive dog genetics book? HAH! What a plan! The people who chair the Health and Genetics committee of the ABCA need to reed one of those books and so do the AKC breeders. I’ve caught both of them in serious misunderstandings of basic genetics and even outright buffoonery.
Having no proviso against inbreeding is very dangerous, especially since in-breeding and linebreeding are favorite tools of the self proclaimed elite breeders. Chasing after popular studs, trying to recreate a famous winning dog by inbreeding his descendants, or dangerous linebreeding to create a signature kennel look happen all the time with little to no remorse when it all goes bad.
Neither registry keeps any sort of health information database. The closest you’ll find is the option of including eye exam results or hip results on the pedigree, but there is no requirement, and the number of breeders volunteering key information is vanishingly small. You’d be hard pressed to find a pedigree with enough volunteered health information on it to be useful in making a breeding decision.
http://www.bordercolliehealth.com is an independent publicly searchable health database for DNA testing of Border Collies. It should be said that the AKC breeder who is instrumental in establishing and maintaining this database recently supervised a close breeding on a past winning dog which produced a litter that was ravaged by the untreatable and incurable Trapped Neutrophil Syndrome (TNS). Most of the puppies died, and only one was clear. And guess what, no remorse from the breeders and the one clear puppy is currently being shown towards his breed championship.
Neither registry has any criteria for membership other than payment. There are no requirements for breeder education, there is not so much as an ethics pledge required. Although, the ABCA does suggest you be “of good moral character.”
Neither registry requires registered dogs to meet any performance standard or physical standard or any standard at all, written or implied. The ABCA won’t turn away your stud dog/bitch if it is aggressive and kills sheep, has no eye, can’t outrun because of horrible joints, and can’t even learn the sit command. The AKC won’t turn your stud dog/bitch away if it is ugly and has a fault in every element of the breed standard or if it can’t limp through an agility course or even if it’s congenitally blind and deaf and can’t hope to train in Obedience. So an ABCA pedigree says nothing about your dog’s ability to herd and an AKC pedigree says nothing about your dog’s Conformation or Agility or Obedience, per se.
For the excessive degree to which these organizations take themselves seriously as champions of the future of Border Collies, when you brush away the makeup, you’re left with a simple biblical list of dog begat dog begat dog begat dog, with about as much verifiability and relevance as such lists in the old testament have to do with modern dating, mating, and health practices.
Neither registry offers much protection against puppy millers other than the higher cost of registration than less reputable registries. The ABCA has only banned known puppy millers after they have been found to falsify pedigree information. There have only been 4 disciplinary actions. These investigations aren’t about the quality of the dogs produced or kennel conditions, it’s about lost revenue to the registry when a breeder will combine multiple litters from two or more bitches and register them as one litter from one bitch to save money using the single litter registration price. update: The ABCA does n
ot have a combined litter price like the AKC does. Here is the stated reason Swafford (I think some of the other actions are related to Swafford, i.e. his children/associates) was removed:
It was determined through an ABCA investigation that Richard Swafford’s breeding practices and kennel conditions were not conducive to accurate registration.
Because the evidence showed systematic misrepresentation by Mr. Swafford of the identity and parentage of the dogs he sold, any dog which passes through his kennel must be regarded as suspect.
That being said, some of the removed parties now use associates to register dogs with registries and still sell them advertising ABCA registration (among others). Apparently one of them has also started their own registry that accepts transfers from just about anyone.
The AKC does investigate breeders who register 7 or more litters per year and randomly investigates breeders who register 4-6 litters. They don’t publish their disciplinary actions that I can find. The AKC has also worked with the Hunte Corporation, the nation’s largest puppy broker. They have begun using DNA testing, but again, this is not for disease, this is simply to prove that the breeder has been scamming the AKC by grouping puppies into fake litters to save on registration fees.
So for all the elitism involved with having either a “herding” bred BC or a “show” bred BC, these terms really only apply to the people who don’t herd, don’t show, don’t train, don’t compete and really don’t do anything with their dogs that’s noteworthy. Only these people find such advertisements as “champion sired” or “from working stock” to be valuable. Herding people will ALWAYS be able to produce more than enough dogs for their herding and trialing needs, and so will the show, obedience, agility, frisbee, and flyball people. So why do registries fight so viciously to fool the hoi polloi? Because the uninformed masses are their bread and butter.
People who breed for specific needs (the breeding members of the AKC and ABCA) and who are involved in dog sport of any kind produce entire litters every time they are trying to make just one special dog for their activity. All the other puppies must be sold. And for people who breed and sell all the puppies, they need receptive buyers who are unlikely to be sophisticated and know the intricate workings of dog breeding and selecting. The registry that wins the PR war provides the most fertile dumping ground for all the extra puppies that are produced. The more fertile the dumping ground, the more their membership can breed to succeed, and the more money the registry makes through all the extra dogs that get registered.
The AKC sponsors several performance activities and awards titles for those events. Having an AKC pedigree isn’t necessary for most of them. Conformation is the only event that doesn’t allow ILP dogs of all kind, and events like Lure Coursing only award points to Sight Hound breeds, but the menu of available dog sport activities is long and varied. Obedience, Agility, Herding, Rally, Tracking, Earth Dog, and Canine Good Citizen are among the many programs the AKC sponsors.
The ABCA’s sister organization, the USBCHA (US Border Collie Handlers’ Association) sponsors herding trials and doesn’t require your dog to be a border collie or have papers of any kind. Even though the ABCA will not register any dogs with AKC in their pedigree and kick out any dogs shown in AKC conformation, the prettiest show BC can still compete in the USBCHA’s trial system. The ABCA does partially sponsor the purse at the National Finals and has a program where members can get money to hold local events like sheep trials or eye clinics.
Even if you include the work of the USBCHA, the ABCA’s reach is mostly relevant to active breeders in the ABCA and the top level handlers who attend the trials that the ABCA is involved in. Despite “owning” most of the Border Collie gene pool, they really can’t compete with the size and scope of programs and polish that the AKC can provide its members. While the AKC might not own a lot of the Border Collie, it does own a LOT more dogs in general, and this is essentially a gravity well that will continue to suck in orbiting breeds that it slowly draws in.
No registry and no single dog activity seeks to create the best pet BC, and that’s what all dogs are 95% of the time. Herding sheep well or looking pretty doesn’t guarantee or even suggest desirable qualities of a pet. Despite their elitism, the ABCA and AKC zealots aren’t looking out for people who want well rounded dogs who are as much family as they are a work tool or a beautiful specimen.
Neither side fights the border war for me or the BC ideal I’d like to maintain for myself. I’m an instant outsider because I don’t believe in the holiness of a conformation standard, nor do I feel that the Border Collie need be only bred as a tool to move stock and all the other concerns and uses should simply subsist off of the leftovers and castoffs of the herding community.
* * *
Comments and disagreements are welcome, but be sure to read the Comment Policy. If this post made you think and you'd like to read more like it, consider a donation to my 4 Border Collies' Treat and Toy Fund. They'll be glad you did. You can subscribe to the feed or enter your e-mail in the field on the left to receive notice of new content. You can also like BorderWars on Facebook for more frequent musings and curiosities.
* * *
HA! Enjoyed this post immensely. Was gleefully looking forward to telling you about Terrierman, since your writing reminded me so much of him, and then glanced down at the previous post! You’re both a treat and I look forward to future posts!
Did you notice that the illustration used for this article was that of the “nerw and improved” show-type Border Collie? 🙂 It’s the same image used for the the Border Collie column in the AKC Gazette. I’m all for the BC remaining as a working dog, but (and I’ll probably get fired upon for this) at least some of the dogs can “get another job” in agility, obedience, working trials, flyball, etc. Not all BCs pan out to be herding dogs.
And, another thing, have you noticed how DIFFERENT the British, new Zealand, and Australian show BCs look? And, now the American BC is looking more and moer like them. I’d say someone has recently added Rough Collie (Scotch Collie) back in to the pot during the past 20-25 years. I believe I even saw an article by a well-known grand dame of herding stating that Collie has been brought back in. Nothing against Collies as they area great breed as well, but the working style is SO verty different. BCs showing extreme intensity, OCD charactyeristics, eye, and couching as opposed to the upstanding, general farm dog style, loose eye and generaly moderate activity level of the Collie.
colliesrtops –
I stole that image right off the AKC site, and it’s also the same image that Donald McCaig uses in shadow behind the working collie in his new book “The Dog Wars.”
I very much agree with your observation that the look of AKC border collies is changing from the influx of the Oz lines, or just the preference for more “pet sized” Border Collies. I was particularly shocked when I returned to a breeder of one of my last BCs 17 years later and found her whole kennel looked nothing like the dog I got from her before and was across the board on the small side.
I’ve written about it with some photos in a couple auto-dog-ography posts that I’ll finish putting the final touches on and publish some time soon.
I’d also say that the look of the working lines is also going towards more McNab looking dogs (perhaps in response, perhaps out of some recent talented dogs that are short haired and prick eared, and perhaps it’s just a sample bias out here in the West.
When I get around to posting those autodography articles about my current two dogs, Dublin and Celeste, you’ll hear all about what my thoughts were a year ago and what they are now. Even a plausible explanation for why the Oz lines are so damn cute and structurally distinct (I think it has to do with what the original imports from the UK to AUS looked like combined with how the American working BC has been changed in look too).
Thanks for the comment, I’d love to hear more about the Rough Collie theory.
Can in-bred pups be registered? Yes. No policy governs in-breeding or line-breeding.
Are there known health problems with in-breeding dogs? Yes. Ask your veterinarian’s advice, or read a comprehensive dog genetics book.
LOL.
retrieverman recently posted..Hunting ice seals with dogs in the arctic
Hey Christopher, enjoy your poignant parlay of knowledge, makes for good reading AND reference IMHO.
Much of what you state in this post with regard to the ‘vagueness’ of good sense from the two organizations can be found in the Canadian Kennel Club’s “Code of Practice for CKC Member Breeders” doctrine. To no surprise, there is no mention of actual breeding methodologies, no discouragement toward inbreeding or line-breeding et al. In all fairness to their mandate..why would they? There are however lots of oxymorons circling the merits toward health and well-being. But one would expect that within the section “Breeding Principles” there would be some touching with respect healthy breeding. There is mention that breeders are required to adhere to Animal Pedigree Act (APA), which I naively anticipated would govern some sensibility. Instead I couldn’t find much to the specifics of ethical breeding, only what appeared to be right and protection of breeders. All in all a very vague non-circumspect arena of fluff and ‘be what you will’ open door latitudes. A ‘wizard of oz’ reality resulting in a catalyst of detriment to society’s pedestal for dogs..sadly.
Code of Practice for CKC Member Breeders
Animal Pedigree Act
The issue with the AKC is that they destroy breeds in their desperate pursuit of looks.
The main difference between AKC and working registrations is the AKC cares about looks and the others don’t. Yes, there are other things the AKC does like obedience and agility, but the ruination comes from the obsession with looks and ‘confirmation’ from judges who don’t seem to understand what a breed standard is.
The German Shepherd is a classic example of this. Take a look at any breed standard from the 1950’s for the German Shepherd, and many of the dogs you see now days would have been put down because they are so far out of the standard. They are over-angulating the dogs, which gives them a crippled look. Look at them from behind, and they are cow-hocked, and most of these dogs cannot finish Shutzhund training – which in Germany, at least they had to qualify before they could be bred. None of them will get to IPO3 or win anything at that level. This is a classic example of the AKC’s obsession with the angular bit of the German Shepherd, which is unique, but is now over-emphasized.
The battle with the border collies is that they have historically been bread for temperament, intelligence, and ability, and nobody cared what they looked like…Until the AKC, and the AKC is all about looks, which is diametrically opposed to what Border Collies were bred for. Anytime you breed for one specific characteristic, you will eventually ruin the breed, and so what you find is if you want a true Border Collie, use one of the many working line breeds, and expect to get something that you may not like the look of, but will have the intelligence, temperament, and instinct that they are known for, however if you cannot work these dogs a lot, every day, you can expect nothing but trouble. If you spend 30 minutes to an hour 4 times a day training or exercising them, you will have a great dog.
The working registrations and their venues could care less what your dog looks like, and instead care how well that dog performs – be it agility, sheep herding, or cattle herding.
That’s my two cents, and this after over 2 years research on breeders, breed standards, and registrations while my wife and I looked for both a German Shepherd and a Border Collie breeder for our next set of dogs.
Doug, I’m well aware that beauty pageants and “Breed standards” are horribly corrosive to dog health and have written extensively about that issue in particular. But it’s not the only issue. Only a small fraction of the AKC is even bothered with shows or standard breeding, and despite the examples of gross conformation abuses, those aren’t the only issues. There’s also the issues of closed gene pools, popular sires, and inbreeding. That has nothing to do, per se, with chasing breed standards and as I’ve also pointed out happens in ALL breeds not just the several we can point to with conformation abuses.
For me, who has no interest in respecting or abiding by some bogus breed standard, the registries are still institutions that stand in the way of maintenance and progress for all the reasons I’ve stated in this post. And those are still problems. And in fact, I think they’re larger problems than show obsessions. Why? Because they represent registry policies that are destructive over time and grow more destructive over time and which rules would have to change, not just fashions changing, to undo the damage. If you don’t want to breed a hound with excessive furnishings, you can do so now, within the registry, no problems. No hoops to jump through. No road blocks. But the institutions will have to change fundamentally if we are going to have more science based, reason based, and risk averse breeding strategies that are allowed to happen within the registry system by those of us who would like to take advantage of those methods and the record keeping of an establish registry.
Christopher,
I suppose how bogus a breed standard is depends on the breed standard. The one I read on German Shepherds (“This is the German Shepherd”, Goldbecker/Heart, 1955) addresses what seemed to me to be all aspects of the breed – physical (weight of males/females, length of hair, bone structure (going into the lengths and angles of the bones, etc.), even pointing out that females should look like females and males like males. You have to have *some* sort of standard, or you have no way to say this is this breed and not a mutt. In Germany, at least, the dog had to pass some level of IPO (tracking, protection, and obedience testing) before they could be bred. I don’t know what it is now. I’m not familiar with any other standard, not even one for a Border Collie, so I can’t address anything else. I’m just saying there has to be some measure of a breed or you have no way to say it is that breed.
The truth of the matter is it’s pretty much about finding a good breeder who does a reasonable amount of genetic testing and doesn’t lie to you. We’ve had border collie breeders outright lie to us about epilepsy in their lines, and there are some breeders who are spreading bad diseases in the pursuit of money.
That brings me back to the registrations – even with them, I find it almost impossible to trace parentage unless the breeder publishes their pedigrees. One of the guys we talked to was sickened to find out he had a lock-eye parentage in his lines, and now he’s trying to figure which dogs he is no longer going to breed because of that.
There’s no registration or breed standard that will fix something like that. What I would like is a comprehensive database/registration with dogs that have symptoms of these diseases, along with their parentage so anyone could do research on those lines. There’s no good answer it seems.
Christopher has nailed every point that I could have made about the elitist attitudes of ABCA and AKC people who are just plain snobby, dogmatic and vitriolic about their negative views toward the other. I have owned several herding breeds and have exhibited AKC dogs in both conformation and obedience. While I have no desire to show my Border Collie puppy in conformation, I will say that there are some breeders of AKC dogs who manage to produce healthy, beautiful working dogs.
The best point that Christopher made was about the hypocrisy of Border Collie breeders who hold their noses at anything that sniffs of AKC while producing plenty of pet puppies who live in homes with people who do not own farms,do not sheep nor live near herding trainers. Why shouldn’t I train and compete with my Border Collie in AKC events? Is it better for me to stay home and not engage my BC’s brain and athletic qualities at all? Obedience and agility are enjoyable for both the Border Collies and the owners. Having seen and experienced (successfully) the conformation world up close and personal, I lost my taste for it. But I think it’s a wonderful thing that the AKC decided to provide competitive events so that people can interact and train their dogs for hunting, diving, agility, etc. I have had 4 other Border Collies. I am a grandmother now and I have a Border Collie puppy who will be registered with both organizations. I am a dog trainer and love this beautiful breed. I look forward to doing agility with him. He may not live in a barn or herd sheep, but he is well fed, well cared for, well exercised, well trained and he gets to use his brain. He is very much loved. So he is more fortunate than many other dogs that are in inferior pet homes or some that are neglected even on working farms.