Of all the procedures that are commonly performed on puppies, the dewclaw removal has to be the least controversial. It’s certainly the most minor procedure with the fewest complications and it offers decent benefits.
None of the common amputations (ear cropping, tail docking, dewclaw removal) are required in Border Collies and the dewclaw removal is really the only one you’re going to see done as a normal practice.
The benefits include: prophylactic prevention of tearing or accidental amputation due to rubbing or snagging during an activity, no need to trim the nails, and aesthetics. The disadvantages include: inflicting pain for questionable gain, wasting money on an unnecessary procedure, possible damage to the leg and decreased performance.
Dublin and Celeste both came with their dewclaws intact and I don’t really see a reason to have them removed. I certainly wouldn’t put them through a surgery for that alone, and since neither has had to go under for another procedure, the thought hasn’t crossed my mind. But neither dog wears down their dew claws which makes me question if they are really used during running and turning. But they’re not insubstantial, so I don’t think it’s as straightforward as removing the rear dewclaws which are typically attached by only a bit of skin and are much more likely to be torn off at the wrong time. Luckily, neither Dublin nor Celeste has rear dew claws.
Both of them do hate it when I clip their nails though. Fortunately they wear down the rest of their nails through normal activity and I don’t have to clip them that often. But those dewclaws grow with abandon and they each have one dewclaw with a slightly abnormal nail that is annoying to cut for both of us.
So last year when the litter was four days old I took them in to the Vet and had their dewclaws removed. Here’s the video:
So it’s about two minutes of pain and then it didn’t seem to bother them ever again. But what a minute there in the middle! They were all fast asleep within minutes of the procedure, there were no complications later, and I didn’t notice any of them licking the site or favoring their front legs. But who knows what associations they made with going to the Vet and pain?
I personally think that a lifetime of causing a bit of pain and annoyance while clipping those dew claws probably outweighs the minute of pain in the young pup, but it’s certainly not a guilt free experience and I’m unsure if I’d have it done again. At least Zeke forgave me after his claws were removed:
* * *
Comments and disagreements are welcome, but be sure to read the Comment Policy. If this post made you think and you'd like to read more like it, consider a donation to my 4 Border Collies' Treat and Toy Fund. They'll be glad you did. You can subscribe to the feed or enter your e-mail in the field on the left to receive notice of new content. You can also like BorderWars on Facebook for more frequent musings and curiosities.
* * *
You write that cutting the front dew claws decreases performance. I don’t know anything about this. What can you tell me about this?
Some sources on the only vet in the country looking into the issues with front paw dewclaw removal and negative effects. Thought it might aid Mr. Diggs question and offer another viewpoint. Reason for concern; watching two of my own dewclaw-less dogs struggle without theirs.
http://www.caninesports.com/DewClawExplanation.pdf
http://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/0/20/32/39/conferences-etrangeres/conferences-penn-vet-congress-2011/9-Zink.pdf
http://www.angelfire.com/nc2/Mestena/dewclawsInjury.pdf
Thanks for those links, they’re very informative.
I was given a simple explanation once. The rear dewclaws, attached by skin, ARE “dewclaws” whereas the front toes are more like true “thumbs” due to muscle attachment. They are just not opposable thumbs. But then, not many creatures have those. Anyway I’ve read stuff like this before and they do apparently have purpose. Any body part can get injured but you have no way of predicting the future. It may not ever happen and probably won’t. How many do you just lop off as a preventative?
I would not bother with it again, I don’t think the rewards outweigh the risk or even the wisdom of just leave the dog alone.
Exaaaaactly. Leave the poor freaking dogs alone! Glad you feel that way. You made me smile. 🙂
What’s interesting is that dogs are the only caniformia with dewclaws. Bears, raccoons, and mustelids have all proper toes. Even pinnipeds have five toes.
It’s interesting that canids have evolved similar feet to several feliformia.
retrieverman recently posted..Morphology vs. molecular evidence in determining taxonomy and phylogeny
I hate back dew claws on dogs,if I ever have a dog with back dewclaws again I`m removing them. Wobbly things that get caught on everything and overgrow like mad.
With him the front dew claws worn down a little,but where still long but the back ones did not and needed constant clipping or they would grow in a circle. That would have to be cut by a vet,sense no dog clipper was big enough.
With front dew claws I don’t think I`ll bother,I do have a dog that I got without them and he seems athletic,turns quickly,able to hold things(in a dog way) and pull himself up. So I haven’t noticed anything different in him compared to the other dogs I had,so having no dew claws I don’t think is a big deal.
I also heard small breed dogs may have loose front dew claws that are just as useless as back ones.
Why inflict pain for absolutely no reason? Barbaric.